[Dissonance] D'Alessio & Allen (2007)
dissonance at psychologie-sociale.org
dissonance at psychologie-sociale.org
Mer 24 Oct 09:03:43 CEST 2007
Référence Complète :
D'Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2007). The Selective Exposure Hypothesis and
Media Choice Processes. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M.
Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds), Mass media effects research: Advances through
meta-analysis. (pp. 103-118). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Publishers.
Résumé :
(from the create) In this chapter we have examined selective exposure
from the standpoint of the theory of cognitive dissonance in its
strictest sense: that of postdecisional dissonance. This term defines
the realm of applicability of the specific conclusions we have been
discussing. It needs to be explicitly stated that we have been
discussing selective exposure that has occurred after a decision between
attractive alternatives. This area of research is interesting
theoretically, but of limited practical implication. By definition, a
theory of postdecisional dissonance can predict neither behavior nor
cognitive processing before a decision, including the decision-making
process itself, and so it is of limited utility to people who have a
vested interest in the valence of decisions. Our findings do imply that
were we car salesmen, we would like to have available a number of
brochures extolling the virtues of the cars we were selling to provide
reinforcing information after the sale. Based on the studies in this
chapter, we have concluded that people routinely selectively expose
themselves to messages in accord with their existing attitudinal
structures and avoid incongruent messages (Study 1). In the specific
realm of human behavior that dissonance theory was designed to explain,
that is, behavior following decisions between attractive alternatives,
people engage in selective exposure with a certain degree of consistency
(Study 2). In specific situations designed to model ritualized viewing
decisions (sequential presentation of stimuli), selective exposure is
substantially more powerful than it is in decisions made between
simultaneously presented stimuli (Study 3). We suspect the reason for
selective exposure being weaker with simultaneously presented material
is that the simultaneous presentation forces users to consider a number
of factors to appear to be making a rational choice, that is, to
formulate an ad hoc theory. We suspect that the use of ad hoc theories
is more prevalent in instrumental viewing (and media use generally) than
it is in ritualized viewing. Finally, on the whole, it is clear that
psychological processes, including but also clearly not limited to
cognitive dissonance, play a role in the consumption of media. It is
critical as we study the role of media in society to remember that
exposure is the first step in any media effects process model. If we
want to know what media do to people, it behooves us to figure out what
people do with media.
Mots-Clés :
selective exposure hypothesis ; media choice processes ; cognitive
dissonance ; cognitive balance
Contacts :
D'Alessio, Dave, University of Connecticut-Stamford, Stamford, CT, US
Allen, Mike, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, US
ISBN :
0-8058-4998-X (hardcover)
0-8058-4999-8 (paperback)
9780805849998 (paperback)
Plus d'informations sur la liste de diffusion Dissonance